A Twisted Crown of Thorns ®

Reformed. Christianity. Evangelism. Modern Culture.

You may speak in tongues if ….

You may indeed speak in tongues if you realise …

What Biblical Tongues Were:

  • The manifestation was supernatural (Acts 2:1-4).
  • The manifestation involved speaking. (We read in Acts 2:4, “and they were all filled with the Holy Spirit, and they began to speak in different tongues, just as the Spirit was giving them to declare” [emphases added]. In fact, we must notice that this activity of speaking in tongues began before any of the listeners heard the speakers. The stress is on what the believers say, not on what the listeners hear. They spoke in other languages. Also, in v. 6 we read, “each one was continually hearing them speaking in his own dialect”; and again, in v. 11, “we hear them speaking in our own tongues the mighty deeds of God” [emphases added]. There is a reason it is referred to as the gift of “tongues,” not “ears.”)
  • The manifestation involved languages that were intelligible. (Cf. Acts 2:9-11; 1 Corinthians 14:19), known (Greek glossa means language; cf. also Corinthians 12:10, 28; 14:21, 22), and not naturally learned (Acts 2:7).
  • Tongues were unsought (Acts 2; 1 Corinthians 12:11, 18).
  • Tongues were of low priority (1 Corinthians 12:28, etc.).
  • Tongues were designed to be temporary (1 Corinthians 13:8-10).
  • Tongues were a sign for specific unbelievers (1 Corinthians 14:21, 22).
  • Tongues were subject both to self-regulation and to external regulation (cf. 1 Corinthians 14:26-27). (The suggestion that all claims to speaking in tongues must be accepted, and cannot be prohibited, has no basis in Scripture.)

What Biblical Tongues Were (and Are) Not:

  • Not ecstatic (i.e. gibberish, or “exalted non-language”; Greek glossa never once means gibberish, which the dictionary defines as “rapid and incoherent talk; unintelligible chatter”; it consistently has the well-attested and common meaning of language. Gibberish is not a language.)
  • Not intended for self-edification (1 Corinthians 14:4; cf. 1 Corinthians 10:24; 12:7; 1 Thessalonians 5:11).
  • Not a “prayer-language.” (There is no positive statement that this is tongues’ design, it does not fit the stated design, and the passages cited do not teach that this is tongues’ purpose.)
  • Not a merit badge signifying superior spiritual maturity or status. (Simply ask yourself: which assembly is the only church in the New Testament that was said to feature tongue-speaking on a regular basis? It was the church in Corinth. Then ask further: what was characteristic of the spirituality of that church? They were as men of flesh, infants in Christ [1 Corinthians 3:1]; it was a church featuring schisms, outrageous heresy, stunning immorality, and petulant stubbornness. None of this consitutes a glowing testimony as to the tongue-speaking Corinthians’ superior spirituality.)
  • Not contemporary. (Whatever is happening today, it is not Biblical tongues. The modern phenomena simply do not measure up to Biblical standards. While studies of thousands of modern “tongue-speakers” have been performed, not one instance fitting the Biblical criteria has been documented. Unbelievers rightly find the modern practice absurd and laughable — which contrasts rather starkly with Acts 2:6-12. On the day of Pentecost, no serious observer, saved or unsaved, doubted the supernatural nature of the occurrence. Today, by contrast, no impartial observer believes the genuineness of “tongues” as unlearned foreign languages!)
  • Not a large-group activity (1 Corinthians 14:27). (If five hundred people are speaking in tongues in church assembly, at least four hundred and ninety-seven are sinning against God’s declared will.)
  • Not to be altogether forbidden (1 Corinthians 13:39b). (However, note well: Paul does not say “do not forbid gibberish, do not forbid babbling, do not forbid so-called ‘tongues’ even if they bear no similarity to genuine tongues.” No pastor has had occasion to “forbid” speaking in tongues for the last 1900 years, because no documented case of Biblical tongue-speaking has occurred.)

Excerpt from Sound doctrine regarding the Holy Spirit: His person,  work and gifts by Daniel J. Phillips

Advertisements

8 responses to “You may speak in tongues if ….

  1. Micah Burke January 24, 2012 at 23:40

    “Tongues were a sign for specific unbelievers”

    Yes! First century Jews who were being told by God that the kingdom now included Gentiles.

  2. savedbygrace January 25, 2012 at 03:04

    I never learn to speak in tongues. in fact I used to criticize those who do it.
    one day, I was shock as I spoke in tongues. tried to stop it, but i cant. It just happens. I never desired it. i do not belong to Pentecostal group. I am just an average believer who is saved by grace.

    I can tell you countless testimonies of this inexpressible utterance –
    After arriving home from work, my wife told me, my 2 yr old baby was almost poisoned after putting a toy in his mouth. that same hour was the time I was speaking in tongues at work, quietly. again It wasn’t me speaking for I cannot do it.

    speaking in tongues without the spirit, is plain creativity. even unbelievers can say words to sound like one.

    I notice when I speak in tongues, the words uttered does not sound the same. they are always different from the previous.

    unlike the ones you hear in public, where the words are the same. copies , perhaps from their leaders. I am not criticizing them.

    long post…

    grace and peace

    • Acidri January 25, 2012 at 09:31

      If I had a vision and saw Jesus, and if he spoke to me, I would not put my trust in the experience. I would trust the one authority that we have been given to know the mind and revelation of God…the word of God ( bible).

      • savedbygrace January 25, 2012 at 11:58

        totally agreed

  3. mor33 January 26, 2012 at 09:22

    I second Acidri.

  4. Pingback: Resources for Acts 2:1 - 4

  5. Rick Stassi May 24, 2015 at 23:42

    Always trust more than one interpretation of Scripture. This is one that requires more analysis as manifestation of the Spirit should neither be taken lightly nor discarded.

    Also, you are saying there is differentiation from prayer language; however, there is prayer language? .

    Thanks for the post!
    Blessings

  6. †disciple† May 26, 2015 at 00:30

    I see you have it all figured out.

    Lean not unto your own understanding. Speaking in unknown tongues is Biblical and evidence of an overflow of the Holy Ghost. Unknown tongues. What you define as gibberish.

    This post is full of wrong information. Paul never said speaking in tongues was of low priority. To the contrary, Apostle Paul thanked God that he spoke in tongues more than all the Corinthians.

    Tongue speaking will pass away when Jesus Christ takes his church home.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: